All very lovely but the light on the first one is simply luscious.
Chuck Norcutt
Chris Barker wrote:
> Thanks, Jeff, I forgot about the difference in magnification.
> Presumably that means that the 35/3.5 is about as fast as the 50/2
> when at max magnification.
>
> Anyway, with no expense spared, here is a little selection of images
> taken with the lens on my E-1:
>
> http://www.threeshoes.net/photography/flowers-macro/index.html
>
> Chris
>
> On 30 May 2007, at 15:51, Jeff Keller wrote:
>
>> If you look at its MTF curves on the Olympus web site, it looks very
>> promising. It looks like the only thing it doesn't match the 50/2 with
>> is its aperture. Given its light weight and relatively low cost it is
>> a very very tempting option. Thanks for verifying that it is working
>> well. I think there is at least one other list member who has
>> mentioned it a time or two.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|