Le jeudi 31 Mai 2007 06:04, Ali Shah a écrit :
> Did you consider the K100D?
I did. But it's not yet really on the 2nd hand market yet, either, and
anti-shake system aside, is very close to the one I bought (main
differences : more af points [can't care less, only one would have been a
revolution already], better jpeg engine [I intend to shoot raw only]).
Overall, my choice saved me more than 200 $ in absolute value had I chosen
the K100D, plus I now have a film-compatible lens, and memory I would have
had to buy along. The pure photographic gain would have been negligible, both
camera sharing the same electronic and most of the software. I didn't
mentionned it, but what really won my decision was the absolutely pristine
state of the camera. Seller told me the lady who was the previous owner was
very cautious, and as a matter of fact everything was still boxed, every
cable in its original plastic bag. Not a spec of dust anywhere. In fact, the
camera is so perfect I thought it was new, end of line discount. If the
autonumbering of pictures has not been reset, the body has made some 2,200
pictures.
--
Manuel Viet
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|