For a photo viewed out of context, yes. For a photo viewed in a wedding
album, no. But if the bride has seen it it's already too late.
Chuck Norcutt
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> Don't you think it's an important visual clue as to the nature of the
> occasion for which the photo was taken?
>
> Joel W.
>
> On 6/11/07, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I loved the shot except that I found all those sharply defined buttons
>> on the back of the dress to be a strong visual distraction. If it was
>> mine I'd pretend that she was turned toward the photographer a few more
>> degrees and clone them all out.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> AG Schnozz wrote:
>>> Ok, I couldn't resist. I was shooting an outdoor wedding Saturday
>>> evening, and the scene just demanded a little bit of something extra.
>>> So, out comes my new acquisition, the Tokina AT-X 100-300 F4. I know
>>> you're probably getting sick of all my shots with this lens, but hey,
>>> it works.
>>>
>>> http://image66.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> This picture was taken at about the 250mm mark and F5.6. The
>>> full-size image is "pixel-sharp" even though it is, ahem, handheld.
>>>
>>> There are far better shots, I'm sure, but I haven't had a chance to
>>> do anything but take a random peek at a few shots.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|