Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Vented hoods for DZ 50-200mm?

Subject: [OM] Re: Vented hoods for DZ 50-200mm?
From: "Johann Thorsson" <johann@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:07:41 -0700
As I understand it people make the holes on the underside, but that is of 
course only on the underside as long as you don't turn it sideways.  I first 
heard about this from Martin Bailey's podcasts 
(http://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/), he had one made from an original 
C at some workshop in Japan (laser cut if I am correct).

Regarding the length, vignetting might be a problem, but the reason I was 
looking for longer versions is simply because the original is rather long - 
but looks wider too.

J


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 17:48
Subject: [OM] Re: Vented hoods for DZ 50-200mm?


>A hood with a hole in the side sounds to me like a less effective hood.
>  Also, reaching out and grabbing the hood to turn the filter is an
> easier task than probing fingers through some holes.
>
> The one that you showed looked like it was longer than the one I showed.
> I think I'd start with your longer one and check for vignetting.  If
> none you're home free.  Otherwise you may need to buy the shorter one or
> get out the Dremel tool.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Johann Thorsson wrote:
>> Not my day I guess - of course it does not... that is why I was 
>> considering
>> buying it in the first place.  I must have been thinking about the 
>> original
>> Oly hood when I was replying.
>> Anyway, I know that some people have been buying the original hoods and
>> making holes in them so they can turn the filter, but buying one with 
>> 67mm
>> thread is far simpler I guess.
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 16:59
>> Subject: [OM] Re: Vented hoods for DZ 50-200mm?
>>
>>
>>> Why does it need dremeling?
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>> Johann Thorsson wrote:
>>>> That is one option, I had found this one myself and am considering 
>>>> buying
>>>> it.  It just needs some "Dremeling".
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/38g6wh
>>>>
>>>> J
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ============================================== 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz