Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Expose Right? was Advice please- stage photography

Subject: [OM] Expose Right? was Advice please- stage photography
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:31:25 +0100
Roger

Your post was quite difficult to read (see below, a snipped  
version).  But I spotted the "expose right" bit and I think I need  
help with that.

You see I have read advice that you should underexpose to avoid  
highlights as the underexposed areas can be raised in exposure in  
post-processing.  But "expose right" seems to me to be the opposite ...

Chris
On 9 Jul 2007, at 10:10, Roger Key wrote:

>
> You could try finding an Olympus C-7070 Wide Zoom. Fine 28-110mm  
> equiv ED lens, RAW, high quality JPEG, lots of options, magnesium  
> body, etc. Bulkier than FUJI F30, limited ISO (max 400).  
> Unfortunately discontinued by Olympus within a year, just after  
> receiving EISA Compact Camera of the Year award.Roger Key, Copenhagen
>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:19:12 +0200> From: nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
>> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [OM] Re: Advice please- stage  
>> photography> > I have heard other people sing the praise of the  
>> Fujis, and I did look > at them briefly, but was completely turned  
>> off by the absence of a RAW > mode. According to the specs, the  
>> new 40 has JPEG only. This is simply > unacceptable to me.> >  
>> Nathan> > Moose wrote:> > Nathan Wajsman wrote:> > > >> ...... It  
>> is especially unfortunate that > >> the compact camera makes are  
>> using the megapixel count as the most > >> important product  
>> attribute to emphasize, and so we get all those > >> cameras with  
>> fingernail-sized sensors onto which 8 or more megapixels > >> have  
>> been crammed. As a result, performance at ISO speeds above 200 >  
>> >> suffers from image noise, and anything above 400 is virtually  
>> useless. > >> > >> > > This is the second time you've made such a  
>> statement. While generally > > true, it is not entirely true. The  
>> exceptions tha
>  t prove/test the rule > > are a handful of Fujis.> >> > The F10,  
> 11, 20, 30 and 31fd all share a 1/1.7" sensor with roughly > >  
> twice the surface area of the 1/2.5" sensor in most small digicams.  
> > > Combined with Fuji's unique, hexagonal pixel layout and  
> whatever they do > > in their processing engine, these cameras  
> outperform the other little > > guys in noise by a very significant  
> margin, generally at least two stops.> >> > The F10/11 were amazing  
> and the F30 is even better. It appears that the > > F31fd is simply  
> an F30 with face detection added, which might actually > > be a  
> plus for street photography. The newest, the F40, finally ups the >  
> > pixel count from 6 to 8 mp, with an only very slightly, if at  
> all, > > larger, 1/1/6" sensor, so the jury is out on whether it  
> will be better > > or worse.> >> > Unfortunately, Fuji doesn't have  
> IS, so for static subjects, these > > cameras aren't much ahead of  
> the better smaller sensor cameras that have > > good IS, although I th
>

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz