Joel,
As you mentioned "If you use your left eye to focus, beware the Nik*ns
however. The
wind-on lever will poke you. The OM2000 is the same way out of the
box, but it is easy to modify the lever to lie flat against the camera
body in use."
Yes, I use left eye to focus, how do I modify the lever to lie to the
body? Thanks.
--
Michael
An Olympus OM system fans
2007/8/3, Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Dean is certainly right that the FE2 (or FM2 for that matter) is much
> more camera than the OM2000, but the double exposure system works
> exactly the same on the OM2000 as it does on the FE2. The timer lever
> is the same as well (if more flimsy). In fact, I believe that Cosina
> created the FM10 for Nikon first and then simply modified it to make
> the OM2000, adding at least one little goodie -- the spot metering.
>
> The FE/FM series is indeed heavier than OM, but not much heavier, and
> not much bigger. These were the cameras that were meant to compete
> with OM head on, or at least check the market slippage in the
> direction of Olympus. The glass is another thing though. Not much to
> compare to the f2.8 Zuikos for lightness. But if you're into f2
> Zuikos other than the 85mm, you're dealing with some heavier glass
> anyway ...
>
> If you use your left eye to focus, beware the Nik*ns however. The
> wind-on lever will poke you. The OM2000 is the same way out of the
> box, but it is easy to modify the lever to lie flat against the camera
> body in use.
>
> Not to go too far into the OT glass, but the E-series Nik*n lenses
> were quite cheap. The 50 in particular was a very good performer.
> This was a pretty inexpensive way to get a secondary Nik*n system.
> There is a lot of very good, relatively inexpensive stuff that mounts
> on a Nik*n. (I've always been meaning to get a Nik*n adapt-all mount
> for my Tamron SP 80-200 ...)
>
> Gary Reese used the OM2000 for some of his lens tests IRRC. He liked
> the fact that the timer lever could be "tuned" to lock up the mirror
> and aperture for as little as 2-3 seconds before firing (once you got
> the feel for it). That is until his lever broke. While it was
> working, the OM2000 was as good as an OM-4 for his lens tests.
>
> Joel W.
>
> On 8/2/07, Michael Wong <mialop@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > That's the major point why I don't go to get Nikon's. I know top
> > models of Nikon's have the feature to take 1st exposure for a roll,
> > and then rewind to the 1st frame to start 2nd exposure .............
> > but I have a lot of Zuiko lenses ...........
> >
> > I have 12 Zuiko glasses ........... it's difficult to switch to Nikon
> > ......... especially Nikon's body is much heavier than OM.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|