I sort of incline to the philosophy that if you can't see the
difference or if you can see the difference, but can't tell which is
better, it is not significant.
When I saw this comparison of Smart Scale, Genuine Fractals, Adobe
bicubic all at once and in 10 percent increments a couple of years
ago, I stopped worrying about it. No free lunch whatever you use.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/software/smartscale.shtml
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On / August 12, 2007 CE, at 8:47 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> My sense is that CS3's bicubic is better than CS2's, but my eyes will
> be 59 years old in October, so your mileage may vary. Lately I've
> been lazy, and have bumped E-1 4.9MP files up to 11x15 using Bicubic
> Smoother and they've looked just fine. I used to use Genuine Fractals
> for that, but frankly, I can't tell the difference for the amount of
> work involved.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|