Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: The pale general... who is no longer pale

Subject: [OM] Re: The pale general... who is no longer pale
From: "Geilfuss Charles" <Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:44:34 -0500
        Two units of RBC's; good to go; charge on Traveler!

Charlie

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:49 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: The pale general... who is no longer pale

OK, here is how the general is supposed to look in his original sRGB.
<http://www.chucknorcutt.com/general_lee/img_4401er.htm>
This has been an enlightening discussion.

Chuck Norcutt

Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> No, there is no flaw in Moose's logic which is impeccable as usual. He

> has solved the problem or at least the source of the problem.
>
> Anyhow, the web image you saw was downsized for the web by Breeze 
> Browser which assumes sRGB for web display and doesn't bother tagging 
> the image with the color space.  So I don't think anyone has yet seen 
> the general in quite the way he's supposed to look.  Now I'm trying to

> figure out how to preserve the original sRGB color in an sRGB image
and 
> will repost it when I've done that.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> Moose wrote:
>> Then if an untagged JPEG displays differently in one of these
browsers 
>> than in PS, it's hard not to conclude that PS is using a color space 
>> other than sRGB. Is there a flaw in this logic?

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz