| Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] lighting detector |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:25:43 +1000 |
How about the uncommon ones? :-) Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 19/09/2007, at 9:15 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > I have also heard that to be true and that iy also makes most > common UV > filters redundant. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] lighting detector, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E330 now or wait for E-3, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] lighting detector, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] lighting detector, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |