Good point, and your other point is just as important, at least to
me. If the contrast varies so badly from the top to the bottom of the
screen, like a laptop display, it would be hard to tell what you are
getting.
There really is a difference between displays. When owners complained
of banding on some of the early Nikon D200 cameras and posted images
with examples I thought they were crazy because many times I could
not see what they were talking about. It was because I was looking at
their images with my laptop which has a pretty good display as far as
laptops go. When I looked at their images on my desktop with its LCD
the banding jumped out at me. It was not subtle at all.
A few companies have made serious efforts to improve image quality
and staking their reputations on it and a lot of others are pretty
much packaging a commodity LCD adequate for business use for a cheap
price. My general rule with buying electonics for a long time has
been to avoid the price leaders which usually have made awful
compromises in design to meet a cheap price, or the top of the line
which is usually the same as the medium priced model with a few extra
little used features. Aim for the middle.
Not to discourage anyone who has ordered one of any brand, but take a
really good look at it before deciding to keep it.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On / September 29, 2007 CE, at 9:24 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> I get tried when site in front of the monitor for a certain time
> and not
> always be able to keep my backbone straight, this cause a few inches
> movement but may be only me.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|