As the article notes we're seeing JPEGs and we don't know how much noise
reduction has been done. That said, the residual noise looks very
pleasant and film-like. I don't think I'd have bothered with Neat Image.
Chuck Norcutt
Dan Mitchell wrote:
> http://www.fourthirdsphoto.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=18384
>
> ISO 1600 seems, if not perfect, pretty usable -- and it looks as if
> the IS works well, too.
>
> -- dan
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|