Matthew Granger wrote:
> Is that something easily repaired? Or not cost effective?
>
I have repaired similar problems on occasion, being a fairly dab hand
with tools. It's usually pretty mechanically simple.
Paying for repair is definitely not cost effective. I don't know what a
Sigma Pantel is, but it sounds like someone selling off-quality stuff
and trying to trade on the Sigma name. It should be a dime a dozen, and
a real 135/2.8 isn't expensive.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|