My experience of the sensor in the Sony a700 is that it is very good
at high ISO. Very. They have an A/D converter on the end of each row
of pixels on the chip - 4000 of the little blighters so that signal
is already whatever. I don't really understand all this technobabble
but I thought it better than the 40D at 800 ISO. Consequently, I see
no reason why they can't manage it.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 21/11/2007, at 8:48 AM, Winsor Crosby wrote:
> If the sensor is
> also from a Sony-Nikon collaboration, it will be Sony's first FF
> effort as well and a lot of coordination will be needed. The
> difficulties in getting acceptable high ISO performance from a 22 or
> 24 MP sensor is not only more difficult than with 12 MP, but the
> expectations will be higher in a competitor to an $8000 camera.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|