| Subject: | [OM] Re: Fine Art Photography |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:42 +1100 |
I dunno - I'm pretty low key about this sort of argument. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 25/11/2007, at 11:08 AM, Moose wrote: > Underexposure is a tool. The tool used is not a determinant of whether > the result is art or not. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OM (and other) equipment for sale, Andrew Fildes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Disregard message/, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Disregard message/, Andrew Fildes |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Fine Art Photography, Gordon Ross |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |