I agree. I don't even see TIF as a good storage option for the same
reasons - massive, slow to open and slow to save. I suppose one could
argue that it is an unchanging standard format that you would be able
to access from nearly any program no matter the changes to psd or raw
formats. Reluctance to use it sort of nullifies that argument though.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On / December 9, 2007 CE, at 1:00 AM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Indeed but I still don't quite get it. The files are massive, (54 on
> a 2gb card) unmanipulable, slow and the only advantage they have is
> that they aren't lossy. Good for storage but.. Is there actually a
> reason for them to exist in camera?
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|