That looks like the classic retread the press release stuff.
He'll have no trouble staying at the top of the list for a loan of
the next model.
I remember with joy a restaurant reviewer who wrote for a satirical
weekly. He always paid for his meal like a regular customer, no-one
knew what he looked like and his reviews were almost uniformly
condemnatory. Accuracy saved him from action but he only wrote about
10% positive and the negatives were delicious.
Unfortunately he wrote a rare positive on my favorite Malaysian
restaurant and within a couple of months, the place was packed and
the prices significantly higher.
I don't think you can get away with it now - one reviewer here was
sued successfully for claiming that his grilled lobster was both
burnt and cold.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20/12/2007, at 5:35 PM, Larry wrote:
> Sounds like a crappy car, and in the usual vein of various biases,
> another review says this:
>
> http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2005/03/28/022205.html
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|