I think 4/3 will be lost by its fixed small sensor if compare with C & N.
--
Michael
2007/12/29, JOHN DUGGAN <john.duggan10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Well the review of the E3 finally appeared in todays issue of Amateur
> Photographer, along with a letter inviting me to renew my subscription
> - which I will decline (more of that later).
>
> Suprise , suprise, The review compares the camera to the Nikon D3 and
> the Canon 1D MK3 and blithely states that it "doesn't really compete"
> as a professional camera.
> Further on in the review it complains that the Olympus 14-45 f3.5/5.6
> produces colour fringing with the E3...put on a budget lens and then
> complain about the results....sometimes you can't win!
> To my mind the whole review is very shallow and seems biased about
> 4/3rds in general.
> Scores the camera at 82% with Eos 1D MK3 at 93% and Nikon D3 at 95%
>
> Regarding my subscription to AP, I do not know what other UK readers
> think but I feel it it no longer value for money. As a weekly
> publication I often find it has nothing of interest - apart from the
> adverts - and the reviews seem very prejudiced, with the notable
> exception of the lens tests by Geoffrey Crawley.
> I think I will just buy it when it actually has something of interest.
>
>
> Regards
> John Duggan,
> Wales, UK
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good
> http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|