Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: List Nanny Question WAS Re: OT, Nabble?

Subject: [OM] Re: List Nanny Question WAS Re: OT, Nabble?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:19:07 -0500
I agree.  I've been plagued with offers of size enlargement for the last 
  2 weeks and maybe as long a 3-4 weeks.  Much higher spam count than 
I've ever seen before and almost all chiding me for my minimal 
dimension.  I think I could do without it.

Chuck Norcutt

Rob Harrison wrote:
> I'm with you Piers. Can we have it removed? I think it opens us all up  
> to more spam, not to mention the 'private' becoming public. I've  
> noticed a dramatic increase in spam in the account with which I  
> subscribe.
> 
> Rob in Seattle
> 
> 
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
> 
>> You will have to ask the subscriber who made the request, Chris!
>>
>> For my part, I wish it had not been requested, as I had had the  
>> impression
>> that comments made on the list were restricted to the list  
>> circulation (save
>> for the obvious limitation that they could be forwarded at will).   
>> Since the
>> list has been nabbled, comments are effectively open to the world  
>> (whether
>> list-subscribers or not) to see thanks to the nabble-google  
>> combination.
>>
>> --
>> Piers
>>
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz