Thanks to all who have replied and especially those who have made
high-ISO RAW images available to me. That is the bottom line for me,
and they have been very convincing. I have this morning ordered an E3
from Foto Konijnenberg, a Dutch camera store (cheaper than here in
Spain, and it was in stock).
Nathan
On 15-jan-2008, at 8:15, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I really like the specs and the feel of the E3 (played with it a bit
> at a local Media Markt the other day). I am therefore thinking of
> selling my Canon outfit, getting an E3 and keeping the E410 as a
> backup body. What is holding me back from making a full commitment to
> the 4/3 system is image quality at high ISO. I do not shoot the E410
> above ISO 800, as I find the images virtually unusable; my Canon
> 1DII, with its larger sensor and fewer megapixels, produces eminently
> usable images at ISO 1600.
>
> I would therefore like to hear from people who have experience with
> both the E410/510 and the E3: does the E3 deliver significantly
> better high ISO performance than the other bodies? This is the single
> most important deciding factor for me, as I hate flash and I like low-
> light environments.
>
> TIA,
> Nathan
>
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> General photography:
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
Nathan Wajsman
nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|