http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E3/E3A7.HTM
About 3/4 of the way down for the varying low light exposures. The
site also has a side by side option so that you can compare cameras.
Nothing about RAW though.
I think it is really impossible to standardize the way you want to
though, especially with the increasingly wider use of CMOS sensors.
Lots of processing of even RAW images has been hidden inside those
little beasts for years. There is some advantage to that, but it all
pretty much evens out in the end I think. Small sensor sites produce
more noise. Period. The only choice seems to be in how you deal with
it and when.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On / February 9, 2008 CE, at 8:28 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I think what's needed to really show what the camera can do is the
> same
> studio shot he normally does (or something similar) but at the highest
> ISO levels and lowered illumination. I know I suggested a T-32 before
> but maybe a 60 watt incandescent bulb far enough away to need 1/30 or
> slower shutter speed at high ISO's could better simulate real world
> low
> light shooting conditions. And JPEG's are fine but we also need the
> raw
> files.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|