I am just over the water in UK, Dharma Singh, in the far north of Scotland
to be precise. I will send you a message off-list.
As to the E-10 etc converters - I am confident that the difference is
principally just the diameter of the mounting ring!
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Dharma Singh
Sent: 18 February 2008 14:30
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: iS/L & Centurion Converters
2008/2/18, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx>:
>
> I can't think why they would/could/should not be usable on digital
> cameras, Dharma Singh. I have in the past used an iS/L 0.8 converter
> on a Min*lta
> A-1 (digital) camera, just for the hell of it, and would gladly get my
> hands on either of the macro converters.
>
> --
> Piers
I'll will gladly send you one of them, but I don't know whether it's worth
the s&h.
I could inform about it when I know you country. I'm living in The
Netherlands.
As I know little about digital cameras the question popped up because there
are converters avaible I think for the E10 and I really don't know whether
they are in essence very different from the iS/L ones.
Dharma S.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|