Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: focus confirmation chip

Subject: [OM] Re: focus confirmation chip
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:19:13 -0500
Perhaps it's just the wide angle (retrofocus) designs that are cramped 
for space.

Chuck Norcutt

Piers Hemy wrote:
> I just checked, Mike, and 180/2.8, 300/4.5, and Zuiko 1.4x are all no
> problem with the Russian chip, they do not come close to the plane of the
> chip so would not be a problem with the Chinese chip either.
> 
> I don't see why you think the 135/4.5 would not work, because the 65-116
> tube (which you would need anyway) is no problem, nor are the bellows (which
> would be an alternative to the bellows). 
> 
> If the Chinese chip is fixed the same way as the Russian chip is suggested,
> then yes, it is with cyanoacrylic adhesive.  It *can* be "cracked" off the
> mount by application of pressure along the lens axis (and I notice that the
> Chinese seller explicitly advises against that!) but I do not think that it
> would represent a problem in day to day use.  On the contrary, it helps with
> installation, since you can correct for initial misalignment (guess how I
> know that).
> 
> --
> Piers 
>         
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Mike
> Sent: 19 February 2008 04:00
> To: 1
> Subject: [OM] Re: focus confirmation chip
> 
> 
>> "When the adaptor fits, the focus confirmation works, but with many 
>> lenses the chip takes up too much space.
> I should have been more specific. I'd like to use longer focal lengths where
> the 4/3 crop is really an advantage. 85~250, 180/2.8, 300/4.5, and Tamron
> 300/2.8 perhaps with a 1.4x. The chip appears to be super-glued onto the
> adapter and looks mighty fragile. A dedicated one for each lens is too rich
> for me. Another lens where IS and focus confirm would be nice is the 135/4.5
> macro but can't see that working. I did try out the
> 300/4.5 handheld with the new firmware and was rather pleased with the
> result. Maybe well braced it would do as a last resort.
> 
> Mike
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz