Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: In camera BW vs post processing

Subject: [OM] Re: In camera BW vs post processing
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:22 -0800
Depends on your camera. If your camera has the option of capturing a  
raw file and a large JPEG at the same time like many Nikons and  
probably others you can get the camera's conversion for black and  
white in the JPEG and then play with the RAW file to post process a  
black and white.

If your conversion software picks up camera settings you will get a an  
automatic black and white conversion in the raw conversion process.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On / February 29, 2008 CE, at 8:20 AM, Ali Shah wrote:

> The writer says: "While most cameras offer
> black-and-white in-camera conversion for amazing
> prints, it’s generally accepted that it’s best to
> shoot in color. In-camera black-and-white or sepia
> modes are great for previewing images, but you’re
> essentially throwing away information when capturing
> that way. Also, digital technology has made
> black-and-white conversion as easy or as difficult as
> you want it to be, so there’s little reason to take
> images only for grayscale use."
>
> I take this to mean that although you set the camera
> to BW - if you are shooting RAW the camera doesnt care
> what BW settings you are using.  The camera just gives
> you whatever data the sensor happens to pick up during
> the exposure which is mainly color information?!!? If
> that is the case - why do manufacturers include a "BW

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz