2008/3/2, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Leandro DUTRA wrote:
>
> With the OM-1, I like to use the original, light, compact lenses in a
> prime kit. 24 or 28/2.8 on the wide end and 80/2 or 100/2.8 for medium
> tele. For primarily portraits, I'd go 80/2, otherwise 100/2.8. With my
> tele eye, I also like the 200/5 in a compact kit.
Yes, a full tele would be nice too.
> Not much point to a T series flash with the OM-1n. The T20 is especially
> close to the lens, making it a red-eye monster. The T32 is better, but
> why pay for all that TTL circuitry that you can't use?
I already have a T-20.
> There is an endless supply of flashes in the more conventional, vertical
> form factor that minimizes red-eye, available used for a song. Many have
> much more control over output than the T series, which were, after all,
> primarily designed for TTL.
Still learning on flashes, not sure what I need here.
> I know there's the Vivitar 283 & 285, and various SunPak models. Digging
> through a drawer, I find a SunPak Auto26SR with twist, tilt, zoom head,
> auto operation with it's own sensor or manual operation with five power
> settings from full through 1/16. I can't imagine I paid more than $10-15
> for it. More likely came free in a kit I bought for something else.
I have heard bad things about SunPak quality, is that just trash talk?
> > , and further down the road a Pen FT. And if I ever get rich, a Leica MP
> > and a M8
>
> Rangefinder, ick.
Rest assured I am not in a great risk of ever getting rich.
--
skype:leandro.gfc.dutra?chat Yahoo!: ymsgr:sendIM?lgcdutra
+55 (11) 3040 7300 r155 gTalk: xmpp:leandrod@xxxxxxxxxx
+55 (11) 9406 7191 ICQ/AIM: aim:GoIM?screenname=61287803
+55 (11) 5685 2219 MSN: msnim:chat?contact=leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|