If the foreground was in focus it would be a distraction from the bird.
If anything I might blur it a little more... but not much.
Chuck Norcutt
Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Needed six shots to get this one, and took him half an hour to allow me
> to get that close - less than two meters.
> We didn't meet in a garden, but on the western side of Punta Ballena, a
> big rocky hill which goes into the sea, during the afternoon. The
> highlight at the upper-left is sunlight reflected from the water surface
> of Playa Portezuelo.
>
> Wish the OM 2n could reach 1/2000 or 1/4000, so as the bird could have
> had less motion blur.
> I don't like to crop images, so if you don't like the OOF foreground
> please tell me so: I'm trying to figure out how many photographs do or
> don't feel an OOF foreground too distracting - ;)
>
> Any other PS hint is welcome !
>
>
> Zuiko Macro 135mm f=1:4.5 @ f=8 mounted on the 65 -116 Telescopic
> Extension Tube, handheld Olympus OM 2n on Auto mode, Winder 2, Eyecup 1
> (-5 diopter).
> Fuji Provia 100F.
>
> <http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2156/2308921779_65bee15cca_o.jpg>
>
> Fernando.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
