Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Another oboy Hong Kong good guy

Subject: [OM] Re: Another oboy Hong Kong good guy
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:55:18 -0500
My threshold is 99% for a high volume seller of tens of thousands of 
cheap items.  My total risk was $20 including shipping.  I did note that 
many of his problems had to do with mail delivery which didn't surprise 
me with gear coming from China. I think I'd look for 99.9% on no more 
than a few hundreds or thousands of items for someone selling high end 
Leica gear.

All I can say is that I got my item cheaply, faster than expected and 
with good email communication along the way.

Chuck Norcutt

Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Strangely 99.1% would bother me and I'd use that brilliant Toolhaus  
> negative checker.
> http://toolhaus.org/cgi-bin/negs
> It means that almost one person in a hundred is unhappy - how many  
> neutrals and withdrawns? And on 50K feedback, that's 500 angry  
> customers.
> Even Cambridge Camera manages 98.4% as I remember and I wouldn't buy  
> a Snickers Bar from them.
> I just BIN'ed a Leica M8 grip from photo-arsenal-worldwide who  
> specialise in some very rare and expensive collectibles (M6 Platinum  
> - $24K).
> Their feedback is 98.5% and at the (inflated) cost of some of their  
> stuff (which is amazing nonetheless) I'd be rather nervous!
> They've got around 31 annoyed customers, quite a few neutrals. And a  
> lot of mutually withdrawns too, which suggests that they do resolve a  
> lot of disputes. However, the comments are enlightening ('arrogant,  
> uncommunicative').
> I bought something off a high volume, low cost per item dealer in  
> California - he had a 98%+ rating and a previous purchase was fine.  
> It turned out to be completely misdescribed, cleverly photographed to  
> conceal the evidence and so on. No response to emails at all. Turns  
> out from a check on Toolhaus that he NEVER replies to complaints -  
> just ignores them. He's got a good feedback rating but he's still an  
> a'hole who relies on his volume to bury his bad feedback comments.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/03/2008, at 1:30 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>> Ooops!  Right you are.  I don't know what happened but I got my stuff
>> OK.  He had a 99.1% favorable rating on over 50,000 feedbacks.
> 
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz