ML Archiv: [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?

Subject:	[OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?
From:	Michael Collins <l43g20th@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:57:03 -0500

> Tourists in Footscray? They must have been very, very lost!

Or walking to Avalon for their Jetstar flight...

Michael


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] [OT] Are film photos better?, Jez Cunningham [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Bob Whitmire [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Jez Cunningham [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Jez Cunningham [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, iwert bernakiewicz [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Michael Collins <= [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, John Hermanson [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Marc Lawrence [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Marc Lawrence [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Chris Barker [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Doug

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Another oboy Hong Kong good guy, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Andrew Fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]