I suppose that's probably the main issue - electronics. There's quite a
price differential between the 2 and 4T, which is fine, given the 4T's
extra bells and whistles and its relative youth - if there's a
reasonable expectation that it will be usable for a good number of
years.
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chuck Norcutt
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:01 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
I think JH said not so long ago (and to my surprise) that Oly still has
4Ti boards available... at a big price of course.
Chuck Norcutt
Walters, Martin wrote:
> Unlike some on the list with multiple OM bodies, my (one and only) OM
> 2N is on its way to John for a CLA/repair. So, I'm wondering about
> getting either another OM 2N or a 4T(i) - and pondering my
> justification to the CDFO. I know the OM 2 is, and will remain,
> clearly repairable for a good while. What about the 4T(i)? Some bodies
> are approaching 20 years old. I presume that if the circuit board goes
> - the primary difference between the two - it's either an expensive
> paper weight or a significant repair bill.
>
> Martin
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|