Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability

Subject: [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
From: Gordon Ross <gordross@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:25:33 -0600
True enabling.  I have an OM1, OM3, OM4 and OM4Ti, I have never owned  
or used any OM2 - I have a good selection of Pens, Stylus, allinones  
and even a couple of the minis and Zuikos that I am not using anyone  
have a good OM2 to trade for any of this gear?

Gord

On 4-Apr-08, at 4:03 PM, Bob Docherty wrote:

>
> Silly human! You need them both, of course! The OM-2SP is also  
> nice. :)
>
> Bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walters, Martin" <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:53 AM
> Subject: [OM] OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
>
>
>>
>> Unlike some on the list with multiple OM bodies, my (one and only)  
>> OM 2N
>> is on its way to John for a CLA/repair. So, I'm wondering about  
>> getting
>> either another OM 2N or a 4T(i) - and pondering my justification to  
>> the
>> CDFO.  I know the OM 2 is, and will remain, clearly repairable for a
>> good while. What about the 4T(i)? Some bodies are approaching 20  
>> years
>> old. I presume that if the circuit board goes - the primary  
>> difference
>> between the two - it's either an expensive paper weight or a  
>> significant
>> repair bill.
>>
>> Martin
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz