TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

[OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability

Subject: [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:22:16 -0400
The vast majority of 4T/Ti's I see have mechanical problems, not circuit 
failure.  Go and buy with confidence! :-)

___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
631-424-2121 | http://www.zuiko.com
omtech1 AT verizon.net
Photo Gallery: http://www.zuiko.com/album/index.html


Walters, Martin wrote:
> Unlike some on the list with multiple OM bodies, my (one and only) OM 2N
> is on its way to John for a CLA/repair. So, I'm wondering about getting
> either another OM 2N or a 4T(i) - and pondering my justification to the
> CDFO.  I know the OM 2 is, and will remain, clearly repairable for a
> good while. What about the 4T(i)? Some bodies are approaching 20 years
> old. I presume that if the circuit board goes - the primary difference
> between the two - it's either an expensive paper weight or a significant
> repair bill.
> 
> Martin 
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>