Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability

Subject: [OM] Re: OM 2N vs OM4T(i) - Relative reliability/repairability
From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:33:23 -0400
Keep in mind that the plain OM-3 has the same battery drain issues of a 
  4.  AFAIK, improved boards were never made for the 3.

___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
631-424-2121 | http://www.zuiko.com
omtech1 AT verizon.net
Photo Gallery: http://www.zuiko.com/album/index.html


Leandro DUTRA wrote:
> 2008/4/4, Walters, Martin <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>  I know the OM 2 is, and will remain, clearly repairable for a
>>  good while. What about the 4T(i)? Some bodies are approaching 20 years
>>  old. I presume that if the circuit board goes - the primary difference
>>  between the two - it's either an expensive paper weight or a significant
>>  repair bill.
> 
> If you want ultimate reliability, go OM-1 or 3...
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz