I've never been there yet but will be doing so in the early fall. Since
your 50-200 is the equivalent of 400mm on a 35mm camera I'd be concerned
whether you could effectively utilize a longer lens. That's into the
range where vibration and atmospheric turbulence can start to cause
problems. You will at least need a sturdy tripod if you're going longer
But definitely take a longer lens if you're going to take facial
portraits of grizzlies. :-)
> I will be visiting yellowstone for the first time. I currently have the
> 50-200. Question is will that lens be long enough for most wildlife or
> do I need to look into something a bit longer.
> If I need something a bit longer would I be better off with 1.4x, 2x or
> third party lens ?
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx