Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Nikon DX 17-55/2.8 on film (Was: Nikon DX 18-200/3.5-5.6G on fi

Subject: [OM] Re: Nikon DX 17-55/2.8 on film (Was: Nikon DX 18-200/3.5-5.6G on film)
From: "Michael Wong" <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:19:55 +0800
That should be shadow.

-- 
Michael

On 17/04/2008, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Look more closely at your 28mm sample, especially the lower right hand
> corner.  But I agree at 35mm.  I don't see any vignetting.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Michael Wong wrote:
> > As everybody's discussion, DX lens is designed for APS-C sensor. Thus,
> the
> > image circle is smaller than FX sensor or film SLR. But, it also may
> apply
> > on FX/film body with tele-focal length range. Visible vignetting at wide
> > angle focal length is understood. Here are some samples for Nikkor DX
> > 17-55/2.8 which shot at the same gathering.
> >
> > @24mm visible vignetting
> > http://www.michaelphotography.net/others/IMG2956_1755_24F8.jpg
> >
> > @28mm no vignetting
> > http://www.michaelphotography.net/others/IMG2957_1755_28F8.jpg
> >
> > @35mm
> > http://www.michaelphotography.net/others/IMG2958_1755_35F8.jpg
> >
> > So I am surprised visible vignetting at 200mm for DX 18-200mm lens & of
> > course DX lens is not good for FX/film body. I wish to say not the whole
> > range fails to apply FX/film body of DX lenses.
> >
> > Actually, the test is just for fun.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz