Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Nikon DX 18-200/3.5-5.6G on film

Subject: [OM] Re: Nikon DX 18-200/3.5-5.6G on film
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:35:19 -0400
You are correct.  I should have said electro-mechanical.  I wouldn't 
expect an E thing to have a purely mechanical device.  Accommodating a 
mechanical aperture arm protruding into the camera is already too much 
of a throw back for Mark.  Adding a wind lever would be too upsetting 
even for me. :-)

Chuck Norcutt

Moose wrote:
> Mark Dapoz wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>   
>>> Since the 4/3 mount and OM mount have basically the same diameter it would 
>>> have been quite possible to include a mechanical stop-down mechanism in the 
>>> design...
>>>     
>> I think it's more than that.  In the OM's the upward movement of the mirror 
>> is what triggers the lens stop down lever.  There's a large amount of 
>> tension on the mirror frame in order to have enough enegy to move the levers 
>> in those large OM lenses.  I can't imagine the tiny E-system mirror having 
>> enough oomph to push the lens lever as it moves up....
> I'm not sure about Chuck, but if I had written what he did, 'mechanical' 
> would have applied to the mechanism already in the lenses, not to the 
> means of activating it. The E series are electro-mechanical, and I 
> assume a solenoid (Already used in OMs starting with the OM-2) or motor 
> would be used on the camera end of such a design.
> 
> Also, on another part of this general thread, I agree with Johann, that 
> there are no significant technical barriers to creation of an OM=>4/3 
> adapter with auto stop-down. Someone suggested it might require chips in 
> lenses, but that's not necessary. A processor and input device, knob, 
> slider, whatnot, on the adapter could handle that. In addition to 
> bringing Auto diaphragm to bodies other than the E-510 & E-3, it would 
> result in focal length in the EXIF and might be easier than making the 
> menu selections for IS adjustment on the E-510 & E-3.
> 
> The problem isn't technical, but economic. I can't imagine the market 
> supporting enough volume to turn a profit on the development and tooling 
> costs.
> 
> Moose
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz