| Subject: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution |
|---|---|
| From: | "Michael Wong" <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:58:05 +0800 |
Thanks for share. -- Michael On 19/04/2008, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > <http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/full-frame-advantage.htm> > > Chuck Norcutt > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] Her name is Irma!, Michael Wong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |