>
> "The replacement for the venerable f/1.8 lens was much smaller and
> very compact, but unfortunately the optical quality is
> nowhere in the
> league of its predecessor. In particular I found pictures taken with
> the 85/2 to be dull and life-less, and images took on a greyish cast
> as well. I'm aware of reports claiming this lens is an excellent
> perfomer and am at a loss to explain this discrepancy in opinions
> (I've tried several 85/2's and they all behaved in a similar manner."
>
Yeah, I read that review too. The 85/2 is never classed in the same league
as any of the 105/2.5 Nikkors. The 105/2.5 is generally reckoned to be one
of the best ever Nikkors.
...Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|