Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and res

Subject: [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:19:21 -0400
Thanks.  Intersting article.

Chuck Norcutt

Winsor Crosby wrote:
> So here the same issue is addressed, but much more carefully by  
> someone who is well respected in the Nikon community. Nikon D2X vs.  
> Canon IDsII. 12MP DX format vs. 16MP FF format. The comparison is on  
> page 8 after you click on D2X review on the index page.
> 
> http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html
> 
> The difference is there, but not huge.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 7:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>> I don't consider that he lied to me about the Nikon lens.  He may  
>> have a
>> perfectly fine 85/2.  I don't know.  But we got lost here somewhere
>> since the real meat of the article is at the bottom where he is  
>> favoring
>> large sensors or, more correctly, large pixel pitch based on the
>> diffraction limits imposed on the sensor by too many pixels.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz