ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitc

Subject:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:02:54 +1000

Oh thank goodness! I don't have to sell everything and start again!
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 20/04/2008, at 8:40 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:

> I'm only interested in RAW, the differences between D3 and 5D are  
> really
> really small in low ISO:

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, (continued) [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes <= [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Moose [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] hello, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: hello, Marc Lawrence

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: [OM]Happy Passover/Pesach to those who celebrate it or even heard of it!, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Back to: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]