Looks pretty great to me for 5% of the image, I've been using the 70-300
with EC 14 for a tele, but have it on the E330 and a tripod or surface
to rest it on is needed for anything at that magnification as there
isn't any IS.
Jim Nichols wrote:
> After trying a longer, manual lens, I went back to the 14-54 2.8-3.5 lens to
> learn more about the camera. The linked image was made using ISO 800, IS
> "on", at 54mm, recorded in RAW, processed in RAW, cropped severely, and
> saved and uploaded as a tiff file. I feel that, even though this is about 5%
> of the recorded image, the details come through because of the use of RAW and
> tiff.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Camera+Alert.tif.html
>
> Any comments, other than save for a longer lens?
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|