I admit that the outside was not very "sexy" and it is a seventies building.But
the inside was wonderfull, very open, enabling communication and inspiring.
It was the most "vivid" building of the whole campus, maybe also because it
was built for
800 students, and now we have 3000 + staff. It was a beehive, and now the
bees will be in tents
and dispersed over the campus, that will be the biggest challenge to
counter.
to keep things together the next years!
we're only just realizing what happened...
Iwert
2008/5/17 Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> And, much as I feel for the students and staff for the loss of all
> that was in it, the Faculty's building did not look very special. I
> am no expert, but 70s buildings look pretty awful, for the most part.
>
> I hope that the fire enables the Faculty to move forward and benefit
> from the accident.
>
> Chris
>
> On 17 May 2008, at 05:31, Jan Steinman wrote:
>
> >>
> >> From: Paul Braun <cygnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Do you know anything about the Wright furniture there? As a huge
> >> Wright
> >> fan, and docent at the Robie House, the possible loss of Wright
> >> furniture concerns me.
> >
> > I can see its historical value, but I think Wright was a much better
> > architect than he was a furniture designer.
> >
> > All the Wright furniture I've tried out were obviously designed more
> > to be looked at and admired than actually sat in!
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|