| Subject: | [OM] Re: Sixteen Bit Scanning and Photoshop |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 07:01:34 -0400 |
I don't think so. Chuck Norcutt Leandro DUTRA wrote: > 2008/5/29 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Why not scanner raw? > > Forgive me my ignorance, but wouldn't that be TIFF? ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Sixteen Bit Scanning and Photoshop, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Comparing OM to E-3 - a fairly serious test, Wayne Harridge |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sixteen Bit Scanning and Photoshop, Leandro DUTRA |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sixteen Bit Scanning and Photoshop, Marc Lawrence |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |