Larry wrote:
> .....
>
> Didn't have much time as I was working the car show, and also didn't have a
> tripod, so had to make do with ISO 800, SR, handholding my cheap $139 Tamron
> 70-300mm LD Di, and some off-brand DSLR that came in dead last in Consumer
> Reports comically expertise-lacking new reviews.
>
I thought that was strange too. Overall, I thouhgt it was CR's best
effort at camera reviews in my memory. But there were anomalies.
Looking again, I'll bet the K100D was dinged for battery life, as the
other measures were right in there. And what is the SD14 doing in Basic
SLRs? A specialists camera if there ever was one.
Then the poor K10D gets put up against cameras that cost twice as much -
and don't even include a lens. Never mind that the K10D has a lot of
high end "pro" features; for their kind of comparison, it should have
been in the first category.
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=28164317
>
Love the iris! Like the other flowers. And the car pics aren't bad
either. ;-)
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|