That is probably the best reason to have both. Also, a plain 2 allows
creative mixing of ttl flash and ambient light.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
Rand E wrote:
> I too, retained my OM-2 rather than keep an OM-2n that I had. My
> reason being that I desired to retain the longer auto exposure limit
> that was reduced on the OM-2n model. Rand E.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> AG Schnozz wrote:
>>> I kept my daffodil OM-2 (not n) in favour over the black 2n,
>>>
>> Obviously the proper answer is that any self-respecting OM lover
>> would have both.
>>
>> I am of the opinion that there is something different between the
>> OM-2MD and OM-2n which makes the 2n slightly better feeling in the
>> hand. Could be something as tiny as a single shaft being changed
>> to/from plastic. But honestly, I could swear that there is a
>> difference.
>>
>> AG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|