Is that to mean that the man, who is presumably the father in most families,
is not considered part of the family?
If not part of the family, of what is he assumed to be a part?
jh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Crawford" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:10 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: wife (was number of cameras)
>I meant the cameras...two OM-4T bodies...LOL
>
> Never been married, probably never will. Marriage is a bad deal for men,
> something I learned in my court battles with my son's mother over
> visitation. My lawyer told me it would have been worse if I'd been married
> to her, because men have NO rights in Indiana's family courts, and most
> states are nearly as bad.
>
>
> --
> Chris Crawford
> Photography & Graphic Design
> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>
> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
>
> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
>
> http://www.plumpatrin.com Something the world NEEDS.
>
>
>
> On 6/26/08 6:49 PM, "Sandy Harris" <sandyinchina@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I have two of them. One I have had for 15 yrs and it is somewhat beat
>>> up. I
>>> treat my equipment really good, so it isn't in crappy condition but ...
>>
>> Interesting start, given the subject "re: Wife ..."
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|