I use one. Its a rugged camera with plenty of features. The D200 produces
considerable noise above ISO 400. Even more than what I remember when using a
D80. Over-all I enjoy using the D200 and didnt see a need to "upgrade" to a
D300.
The Tokina 12-24 is a highly regarded lens - constant F4 through the focal
range. I prefer the Sigma 10-20 tho because that 2mm makes difference IMO.
--- On Mon, 9/22/08, John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: N*kon D200
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, September 22, 2008, 8:39 AM
> I'm looking for opinions on the N*kon D200? Anyone
> here using one?
> Image quality? I was offered a low use one (with a Tokina
> 12-24) in
> exchange for my used RB67.
>
> ___________________________________
> John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
> 21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
> www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
> Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|