John Hudson wrote:
> If a digital camera is a means to capture visual experience and with that
> experience being translated into a printed or projected image, and that there
> is limit to the ability of the human eye to discern detail beyond a
> certain degree of detail, is there a limit beyond which the expansion of
> digital capture, in terms of so many maga pixels, will either stall or slow
> down ?
>
> Hasellblad's H3D11-50 might be a 50 MP jobbie but how many ordinary folk will
> be wanting a a 200 inch by 200 inch print from their neighbourhood Costco /
> Wal-Mart / Asda one hour print shop?
>
> In the ordinary world of serious amateurs and pro photograhers, the likes of
> which populate this OM list, is there likely to be an upper limit beyond
> which the mega pixel capture of digital cameras will cease to have any
> relevance?
>
Yes.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|