Moose wrote:
> My comments about Glow were strictly photographic technique. I quite
> prefer the natural breasts and the look of the image to either of the
> two shots of Michelle. I simply thought it would look even better, with
> a more natural perspective, shot with a longer lens and/or at a slightly
> different angle.
>
> Is there a book "Portrait Photography for Boobs"?
>
Photography FOR Boobs? Or Photography OF Booba? Or Photography BY
Boobs? Or the deluxe "Photography of boobs, For boobs, By boobs."
I see what you're saying about the slight WA distortion. I have to
admit, it really didn't bother me. But it would be interesting to see
the same shot with a more portrait-ish lens.
--
Paul Braun
Valparaiso, IN
"It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." - David St. Hubbins
"Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon
"The Fountain of Youth is a state of mind." - The Ides of March
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|