On Dec 3, 2008, at 1:23 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Couple of interesting points. The converse of AG's situation also
> appears to be true. The Z. 200/4 seems to have very nice bokeh on
> the
> E-1 but so-so on film. I remember iwert's wonderful portrait and am
> glad he provided the link again. I suspect the 100/2 has nice bokeh
> on
> film
> FF. Why use USM on the background which can only harshen the bokeh,
> unless time limits selecting out the subject?
>
> Mike
Ditto, so-so on OM1n, brilliant (for the most part, highlights
notwithstanding) on the E3.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|