It sometimes helps to ask yourself if you'd be studying the image at all
if there was an unknown name attached. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
>> But then perhaps they don't transfer to the screen very well. There
>> are some interesting mixes of colours, but many of them are too dark
>> to see. You'd have to have a pretty light place to find the subject
>> in some of them.
>
> I agree Chris, some of them don't transfer to the screen well and the reason
> is that the images didn't transfer very well to the original prints ! I've
> seen some of his original prints (I think it was a 30yr retrospective in
> Melbourne a few years ago), some printed maybe 2m wide, some I thought were
> very disappointing considering his reputation. You can understand that the
> technical quality might be a bit poor given that he was shooting in very low
> light, but in some cases the actual subject matter was just not interesting.
>
>> It's a good thing that AndrewF isn't listening ... :-)
>>
>
> I wonder ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.17/1846 - Release Date: 12/12/2008
> 6:59 PM
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|