At 05:12 PM 1/10/2009, Moose wrote:
>Ken Norton wrote:
>> Moose wrote:
>>
>>> I view this rule as like DOF, dependent on viewing distance and
>>> sharpness. HD on a good set carries so much more detail that it stands
>>> up to closer viewing. 1:4 doesn' seem at all too close to me.
>>>
>>
>> Studies have shown that 1:5 - 1:8 is the typical distance that has evolved
>> through the years. It is not a rule festooned on the consumer, but what the
>> consumer has done themselves.
>
>I understand, and do not disagree. I am only suggesting that it may be
>changing.
Changing, yes, and have any of you been to an Imax theater? Do they
even have such a thing out there in the IA flatlands? I made the mistake
of wearing my distance glasses the last time I went, should have worn
the reading glasses.
WayneS
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|